Under the Skin

Product Information

Johansson demonstrated early in her career, specifically in Girl With a Pearl Earring 10 years ago, that she was fully capable of holding the screen by herself and being fascinating while doing very little, and she succeeds admirably at it again here. She’s been made to look as plain and ordinary as she ever has been onscreen. If the director had provided more for the audience to go on — a sense of what drives her to the point of transformation, even transfiguration — reactions to her, and to the film, could have been quite different and significantly stronger. The protagonist is Isserley, an extraterrestrial sent to Earth by a rich corporation on her planet to kidnap unwary hitchhikers. She drugs them and delivers them to her compatriots, who mutilate and fatten her victims so that they can be turned into meat, as human meat (called voddissin) is a very expensive delicacy on the aliens' barren homeworld. Humans are referred to as Vodsels by the extraterrestrial beings ( voedsel means "food" in Dutch). She became aware of a rattle somewhere above the wheel on the passenger side. She listened to it, holding her breath, wondering what it was trying to tell her in its quaint foreign language. Was the rattle a plea for help? A momentary grumble? A friendly warning? She listened some more, trying to imagine how a car might make itself understood. (5) Aftab, Kaleem (29 July 2013). "Review: Under the Skin– Even Scarlett Johansson can't save Jonathan Glazer's laughably bad alien hitchhiker movie". The Independent. London . Retrieved 4 September 2013. the humanities are … now struggling to catch up with a radical revaluation of the status of nonhuman animals that has taken place in society at large. A veritable explosion of work in areas such as cognitive ethology and field ecology has called into question our ability to use the old saws of anthropocentrism (language, tool use, the inheritance of cultural behaviours, and so on) to separate ourselves once and for all from animals, as experiments in language and cognition with great apes and marine mammals, and field studies of extremely complex social and cultural behaviours in wild animals such as apes, wolves, and elephants, have more or less permanently eroded the tidy divisions between human and nonhuman. And this, in turn, has led to a broad reopening of the question of the ethical status of animals in relation to the human—an event whose importance is named but not really captured by the term animal rights. (xi-xii; emphases in original)

Satirical comment on our human culture is made in a number of ways in the text: by a dystopian reflection of our possible future in the glimpses we get of Isserley’s ravaged home planet and inequitable society, as well as in Isserley’s direct reflections on the vodsel species in her comments, for instance, on our television programs (51; 144-46) and on unemployment: a b c "Under the Skin (2014)". British Film Institute. Archived from the original on 24 March 2016 . Retrieved 21 August 2017. a b "Under the Skin, Venice Film Festival, review". The Daily Telegraph. London. 9 April 2013. Archived from the original on 6 September 2013 . Retrieved 4 September 2013. Rebecca (29 January 2021). "Under The Skin Locations in Scotland (Full List + Map!)". Almost Ginger . Retrieved 29 June 2022. Smith, Jules. “Critical Perspective on Michel Faber.” British Council Contemporary Writers. 2004. Online. 2 May 2009.

Evidence of Isserley’s becoming-animal permeates the remainder of the text. The imagery shifts to begin to identify Isserley with the vodsels: the reader finds a description of “the waving seaweed of her hair” (248) which recalls the earlier description of the butchered vodsel’s eyelashes as seaweed. She begins to try to view herself from the perspective of another species, if only in terms of her physical appearance: “she tried to see herself as a vodsel might” (250). And she begins to insist on an identity that is not determined by belonging to one species or another: “She wasn’t anybody’s kind—the sooner he understood that, the better it would be for both of them” (258). The most significant encounter in this second half is that with another Anomalous figure, the vodsel murderer, as weary with his life of killing as she is. Isserley feels a strange affinity with this vodsel; she cannot read him as she normally reads the hitchers, just as she cannot read herself: “She’d never had anyone quite like him before. She wondered, alarmingly, if she liked him” (267). The language of the text brings them together: “They sat in silence for a while, as the fresh air blew in. Isserley breathed deeply, and so did the vodsel. He seemed to be struggling with something, just as she was” (270). In the end, he decides to have mercy on her and let her go; she also decides to have mercy on him, in a way, by ending his painful life: “‘I’m sorry,’ she whispered. ‘I’m sorry’” (271). Of course the events of yesterday … or was it the day before?... She wasn’t exactly sure how long she had spent on the jetty afterwards … but anyway, those events … well, they had upset her, there was no denying that. But it was all in the past now. Water under the bridge, as the vodsels … as she’d heard said. (207; emphasis in original) In the years 2001 to 2004, Faber reviewed books for the Scotland on Sunday newspaper. Throughout 2004, he wrote a regular feature for The Sunday Herald called "Image Conscious", analysing the layers of meaning, intent and association in various photographs. Since 2003, he has reviewed for The Guardian, mainly choosing foreign fiction in translation, short story collections, graphic novels and books about music. This is a complicated issue. Maintaining a respectful distance between life and work is more important for a writer like Hanif Kureishi, say, or James Joyce, because there's so much overlap between the author's autobiography and what gets recycled in the fiction. I don't have to worry about those boundaries being misunderstood because my work doesn't exploit my life in that way. It's perfectly obvious to anyone that I'm not a 19th century teenage female prostitute or an extraterrestrial predator. Florian Auerochs, "Planetarisch, dysphorisch, nonhuman: Michel Faber's 'Weltenwanderin' in Jonathan Glazer's UNDER THE SKIN." In: Jörn Glasenapp (Hg.), Weltliteratur des Kinos. Wilhelm Fink Verlag, Paderborn 2016, ISBN 978-3-7705-6050-9, pp.263–288. (in German)

Brooks, Xan (9 February 2013). "Under the Skin– Venice 2013: first look review". The Guardian. London . Retrieved 4 September 2013. With each male specimen who steps into the passenger seat of her little overheated car, Faber adds another piece to the puzzle of this alien kerb-crawler. There is something strange about her legs; her grasp of the world around her is patchy, yet occasionally her insights into the banal are so beautiful that they bring up you short. Notwithstanding the clever characterisation, the real triumph is Faber’s restrained, almost opaque prose. This is a man who could give Conrad a run at writing the perfect sentence. At literary festivals over the years, quite a few fans of Under the Skin have thanked me for turning them into vegetarians. I don’t know what to say to them. I’m not a vegetarian. For me, Under the Skin is not about the evils of eating meat but about the evils of evading moral responsibility for the decisions we make. The novel is strong enough, however, to adapt to the needs of each reader. It takes people to a place where they can work important stuff out for themselves. This has continued to be my aim for all my books.Under the Skin provides one example of the humanities catching up with research in the sciences in this respect in its exploration of the powerful role of language in creating a (false) ontological distinction between human and nonhuman animals. The question remains, philosophically, however, where do the humanities go from here? Derrida suggests that what must happen is a turn to “the logic of the limit” that would entail a concern with “a properly transgressal if not transgressive experience of limitrophy” (29; emphases in original): Tuttle, Lisa. “Pets and Monsters: Metamorphoses in Recent Science Fiction.” Where No Man Has Gone Before: Women and Science Fiction. Ed. Lucie Armitt. London: Routledge, 1991. 97-108. The Crimson Petal and the White, Under the Skin, The Book of Strange New Things, LISTEN: On Music,Sound and Us Though Glazer said he wanted to make a film "more about a human experience than a gender experience", [13] several critics identified feminist and gender themes. The Economist wrote that "there is some aggressive sexuality in the film: women seem very vulnerable but then men's desires are punished". [13] In The Mary Sue, Kristy Puchko wrote that Under the Skin "creates a reverse of contemporary rape culture where violence against women is so common that women are casually warned to be ever alert for those who might harm them ... By and large men don't worry about their safety in the same way when walking home late at night. But in the world of Under the Skin, they absolutely should." [14]

Critics highlighted the exploration of empathy as a defining human capacity, with Johansson's character coming to share in this over the course of the film. [8] [9] [10] Noting that a turning point occurs during Johansson's character's encounter with the man with facial tumours (played by Adam Pearson), the philosopher Colin Heber-Percy wrote: "The film suggests it is our very weakness which we value, which makes us us. [...] [The alien] recognises herself in the world, in the middle of things; she recognises herself as subject among subjects. In short, she chooses (or cannot fail to choose) to become human, to empathise, to be weak as flesh." [11] The lecturer Maureen Foster, who highlights Johansson's character's examination of herself in the mirror before releasing Pearson's character, writes that the film presents empathy as "a definition for what is human", with the alien discovering "something in herself that was either lost or had never been there in the first place." [12]The novel is darkly satirical. Its themes include sexism, big business, factory farming, animal cruelty and experimentation, environmental decay, class politics, rape, and treatment of and attitudes toward immigrants. It reflects on more personal questions of sexual identity, humanity, snobbery, and mercy. The work also challenges the idea of an objective humanity, the balance between darkness/pessimism and optimism/transcendence, and the treatment of unsuccessful members of society (unemployed, unattractive, dysfunctional, marginalized) and their roles. a b Khomami, Nadia (27 December 2014). "Making music for Scarlett: how an indie composer hit the big time". The Guardian . Retrieved 1 March 2015. Foster, Maureen (2019). Alien in the mirror: Scarlett Johansson, Jonathan Glazer and Under the skin. Jefferson, North Carolina. ISBN 978-1-4766-7042-3. OCLC 1089496572. {{ cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher ( link) How did you feel about the translation of Under the Skin to the screen? What was it like for you to see the ideas in the book handled so differently? Glazer's iron will is nothing new. Even before Sexy Beast, he walked away from his planned debut – the film Gangster No 1, later made elsewhere – after disagreements over casting. His relationship with advertising is strained these days. In 2010, he shot a commercial for Cadbury Flake, in which the French actor Denis Lavant cavorted as a crimson, Byronic chocolate demon. The ad never ran; when it surfaced online, Cadbury's lawyers demanded its removal. Glazer says that in commercials now, "fear abounds".