The MC Trainer 2’s heel feels more forgiving for running and jumping and the base of the forefoot seems to articulate a lot easier in this model, and this model broke in a lot easier than the MC Trainer. Since we all have different weekly training breakdowns and biases, it can be useful to cross-reference how different shoes will perform in different settings and align with your training needs. Note, when training and tightening this shoe, I didn’t have slip issues, which is a positive thing for those that just want this model for training. However, if you are like me and enjoy wearing your training shoes on a daily wear basis, this could be a deal breaker. To discuss the performance of the Nike MC Trainer 2, I’m going to break down how this shoe performs in different training contexts. I’ll talk about this shoe’s performance for lifting, versatile training, shorter runs, and daily wear.

Second, the increased mobility in this shoe is awesome for explosive and multi-directional training. For HIIT workouts and athletic-style training, I thought the Nike MC Trainer 2 did a pretty good job. For versatile training, I enjoyed the performance of the Nike MC Trainer 2 and think it has an edge over the original model in this context, and that’s for two reasons. While I like the Nike MC Trainer 2 and think it’s better than the original model, there are a few cons to note about this shoe before investing in them. The model was designed with a wide sole to provide you with sufficient support for classic strength exercises such as squats and deadlifts. Additional stability and a longer service life provide overlays in the area of ​​the toes and the lacing. A cushioning midsole has been incorporated to provide the necessary dynamics for explosive exercises such as sprints or burpees. The cushioning foam it contains absorbs the resulting pressure and enables training that is easy on the joints. The high responsiveness of the sole improves your agility. Lateral Support and Varied GripAnother thing to note about the MC Trainer 2’s sizing is that it has a low-profile boot and low upper volume. If you have custom orthotics or inserts, you may want to pass on this model due to the low-profile nature of this shoe. It can be an okay budget model for hybrid workouts that have short runs programmed. This shoe’s firmer ride can get pretty uncomfortable for longer runs, so I’d suggest exploring models that are more running-friendly if you need a shoe for this ask. The Nike MC trainer is definitely grippy. This shoe gives you a great solid foundation to really get a good lift in. Whether it is squats, or deadlifts, or even box jumps, the MC Trainer will meet your needs without leaving you feeling like you need to add something else to your arsenal.

This shoe’s midsole provides a nice level of stability and when working with trap bar deadlifts over 425 lbs, I didn’t notice any glaring compression issues with this shoe. I also liked the level of tread the outsole provided on different surfaces.This shoe’s midsole provides a nice level of stability for heavier lifting sessions, and it also has a nice level of responsiveness for plyometrics and athletic-style workouts. If you like shoes with firmer midsoles, you’ll enjoy this about the MC Trainer 2. are looking for something to regularly run in (the Nike Free Metcon 3 is a good cross-training shoe for running) On top of this, since this shoe has a low-profile boot construction and it can be prone to heel slip issues, sizing up will probably not be an option for most lifters and athletes. For wide and even flat feet, the size inclusivity of this model just isn’t there. Performance Over the course of my training sessions and review process with the Nike MC Trainer 2, I’ve found multiple things to like about this model. Another thing to like about this model for lifting is that I feel as though it articulates a little better than the previous MC Trainer and other budget-friendly training shoes. When doing sled work and lunges, this shoe’s toe box offered a fair amount of flexibility.

The third and final difference to note is each shoe’s flexibility. The MC Trainer 2 feels less “stiff” through the midfoot and toe box compared to the MC Trainer. In my opinion, this is a big pro for training with the MC Trainer 2. First, the Nike MC Trainer 2’s tongue construction isn’t the best. The MC Trainer didn’t have issues with its tongue due to it having two tongue loops that sat lower on the tongue versus the singular loop that’s placed higher on the MC Trainer 2. The second aspect to like about the Nike MC Trainer 2 is its performance for athletic-style training. If you’re someone who on a weekly basis likes to lift, do HIIT workouts, do plyometrics, do agility work, and even some sprints, the MC Trainer 2 can be a good option to explore.

Nike Mc Trainer 2

For short runs, the Nike MC Trainer 2 has a pretty average performance. This model will work best for sprints, short interval runs, and short mileages ranging from 1-2 miles pre and post-workout. The final aspect that I like with the Nike MC Trainer 2 is that it feels more flexible than the original MC Trainer. One of my complaints with the first model was how stiff the midfoot and heel could feel at times. Overall, I’ve enjoyed the performance of the Nike MC Trainer 2 for versatile training. They’re a consistent model that delivers a strong performance for the price, and they can be a good shoe to beat up for both indoor and outdoor workouts. Testing the Nike MC Trainer 2 for Short Runs and Daily Wear

But if you have wide feet, this is probably not your best bet. It could even seem a little tight if you have a mid-range foot.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Additionally, these will not be the best CrossFit shoes on the market. They’ll work for casual WODs here and there but will fall short as you get more niche and serious with your training. The lifting performance with these shoes will be best for casual and recreational sessions. Testing the Nike MC Trainer 2 for Versatile Training